Jesper De Jong vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. De Jong vs N. Fatic

Jesper De Jong

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

C. Rank

212

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nerman Fatic

BIH

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

C. Rank

212

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Jong 1 - 0 Fatic

They have played 3 sets in total, with Jesper De Jong winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 1. The last match between Jesper De Jong and Nerman Fatic was at the Rome Challenger, 22-04-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret..

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Jong	1
Fatic	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Rome Challenger(04-22-24)

Stats

Jesper De Jong

Nerman Fatic

J. D. Jong vs N. Fatic H2H Profile

J. D. Jong	Stats	N. Fatic
$1,079,930	Career Prize Money	$73,995
61.80% (288-178)	Career Total W/L	58.47% (404-287)
1	Clay	0
7	Titles	12
1	Total H2H Matches	0
54.84% (17-14)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-1)

J. D. Jong vs N. Fatic Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jesper De Jong has won 46.98% of points on their second serve, while Nerman Fatic has won 44.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jesper De Jong, in recent form, has won 44.66% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nerman Fatic has won 45.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.05% and 27.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jesper De Jong has saved 62.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nerman Fatic has saved 53.66% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jesper De Jong has won 53.03% of matches played (W/L 35/31), with Nerman Fatic winning 72.31% (W/L 47/18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jesper De Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 94/47), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 6/12). Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Jesper De Jong has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 14/12), where as Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jesper De Jong winning 1 times and Nerman Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jesper De Jong winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 1.
The last match between Jesper De Jong and Nerman Fatic was at the Rome Challenger, 22-04-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret..
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:26:56.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jesper De Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of 145.14 while Nerman Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 326.03.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jesper De Jong has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nerman Fatic has won 81% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jesper De Jong has converted 33.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nerman Fatic has converted 30.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jesper De Jong vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. D. Jong vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. D. Jong	Stats	N. Fatic
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
14	Games Won	13
3	Aces (Total)	5
2	Total Double Faults	1
2:26:56	Average Match Time	2:26:56
57% (49/86)	1st Serve %	70% (58/83)
78% (38/49)	1st Serve Win %	71% (41/58)
51% (19/37)	2nd Serve Win %	56% (14/25)
20% (1/5)	Break Pts Won %	67% (2/3)
34% (28/83)	Return Points Win %	34% (29/86)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

J. D. Jong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025
Q3 Tomas Martin EtcheverryT. Martin	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Q1 Kamil MajchrzakK. Majchrzak	W	4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4)	Stats
Erste Bank Open - Vienna - 20-10-2025
Q1 Matteo ArnaldiM. Arnaldi	L	6-4 7-6(5)	Stats
BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm - 13-10-2025
R1 Marton FucsovicsM. Fucsovics	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai - 29-09-2025
R3 Felix Auger AliassimeF. Auger	L	6-4 7-5	Stats

View All

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

J. D. Jong vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. D. Jong	Stats	N. Fatic
61.80% (288/178)	YTD Win/Loss	58.47% (404/287)
59.46% (641/437)	Sets Win/Loss	57.49% (890/658)
54.13% (5567/4717)	Games Win/Loss	53.03% (7602/6734)
66.67% (94/47)	Hard Win/Loss	51.19% (43/41)
64.45% (165/91)	Clay Win/Loss	61.00% (341/218)
45.10% (23/28)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.48% (20/26)
33.33% (6/12)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
0.4	Aces Per Game	0.23
2012	Aces Total	1598
0.24	Double Faults Per Game	0.22
1225	Total Double Faults	1517
1:41:13	Average Match Time	1:20:1
382.74	Average Opponent Rank	509.22
60% (19117/31871)	1st Serve %	66% (23791/35820)
70% (13467/19117)	1st Serve Win %	65% (15579/23791)
51% (6492/12754)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (5772/12029)
42% (1419/3373)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (1969/4222)
41% (13212/32228)	Return Points Win %	43% (15618/36165)
60.98% (25/16)	Slam W/L	20.00% (1/4)
53.85% (7/6)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/1)
50.00% (1/1)	Cups W/L	40.00% (4/6)
47.92% (23/25)	Main Tour W/L	25.00% (3/9)
60.48% (127/83)	Challenger W/L	52.89% (119/106)
69.08% (105/47)	Futures W/L	63.24% (277/161)
62% (274/442)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	60% (394/662)
50% (6/12)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/3)
52% (87/168)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (79/156)
53% (74/139)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (102/189)
88% (281/247)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (394/348)
12% (281/34)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (394/42)
21% (185/39)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (297/57)